通用数据保护条例（GDPR）/ General Data Protection Regulation – 中英文维基百科词条融合

By cathayvista互联网, 区域：欧洲西部（不含独联体国家）, 法律

中文词条原文链接（无法从中国内地访问）：点击这里访问。
英文词条原文链接（无法从中国内地访问）：点击这里访问。
本文基于英文词条的线索，并补充部分来自中文词条的内容（在二者冲突时，以更晚更新者为准）。辽观搬运时进行了必要的合规化处理，以使其能够在中国内地上传。

维基百科（Wikipedia）是美国维基媒体基金会的互联网百科项目（点击这里了解更多），其内容可能受到立场、信息来源等因素影响，请客观看待。正文内容不代表译者观点。

辽观提供的翻译仅供参考。文中可能包含无法从中国内地访问的链接。

辽观所搬运的词条，其文本与原维基百科词条中的文本同样遵循CC-BY-SA 4.0协议，在符合协议要求的情况下您可以免费使用其内容（包括商用）。 图片、视频可能遵循不同的协议，详见本文涉及的共享协议

1. 正文（发布于知乎专栏）

请点击这里访问

2. 参见（维基百科的相关词条，无法从中国内地访问）

Similar privacy laws in other countries:
参考译文：其他国家类似的隐私法：

Related EU regulation:
参考译文：相关的欧盟规定

Related concepts:
参考译文：相关概念：

3. 参考文献

3.1 英文词条引用列表

  1. ·  “Presidency of the Council: ‘Compromise text. Several partial general approaches have been instrumental in converging views in Council on the proposal for a General Data Protection Regulation in its entirety. The text on the Regulation which the Presidency submits for approval as a General Approach appears in annex,’ 201 pages, 11 June 2015, PDF”. Archived from the original on 25 December 2015. Retrieved 30 December 2015. 
  2. ·  Francesca Lucarini, “The differences between the California Consumer Privacy Act and the GDPR” Archived 12 July 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Adviser 
  3. ·  Article 3(2): This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to: (a) the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or (b) the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the Union.
  4. ·  “What is personal data?”. January 2021. Archived from the original on 24 July 2019. Retrieved 22 July 2019. 
  5. ·  “EUR-Lex – 32016R0679 – EN – EUR-Lex”. eur-lex.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 17 March 2018. Retrieved 21 March 2018. 
  6. ·  “REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL (article 30)”. Archived from the original on 28 June 2017. Retrieved 7 June 2017. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Archived 16 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine.
  7. ·  “Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA”. 4 May 2016. 
  8. ·  The Proposed EU General Data Protection Regulation. A guide for in-house lawyers, Hunton & Williams LLP, June 2015, p. 14
  9. ·  “Data protection” (PDF). European Commission – European Commission. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 December 2012. Retrieved 3 January 2013. 
  10. ·  “EUR-Lex – 32016R0679 – EN – EUR-Lex”. eur-lex.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 6 November 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2017..
  11. ·  “newsmyynews”. Archived from the original on 22 October 2020. Retrieved 21 October 2020. 
  12. ·  “General_Data_Protection_Regulation”. Archived from the original on 22 October 2020. Retrieved 21 October 2020. 
  13. ·  “Age of consent in the GDPR: updated mapping”. iapp.org. Archived from the original on 27 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  14. ·  “How the Proposed EU Data Protection Regulation Is Creating a Ripple Effect Worldwide” Archived 17 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine. Judy Schmitt, Florian Stahl. 11 October 2012. Retrieved 3 January 2013.
  15. ·  Hern, Alex (21 May 2018). “Most GDPR emails unnecessary and some illegal, say experts”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 May 2018. Retrieved 28 May 2018. 
  16. ·  Kamleitner, Bernadette; Mitchell, Vince (1 October 2019). “Your Data Is My Data: A Framework for Addressing Interdependent Privacy Infringements”. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 38 (4): 433–450. doi:10.1177/0743915619858924. ISSN 0743-9156. S2CID 201343307. 
  17. ·  “Official Journal L 119/2016”. eur-lex.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 22 November 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  18. ·  “Guidelines on the right to data portability under Regulation 2016/679”. European Commission. 2017. Archived from the original on 29 June 2017. Retrieved 2 November 2023. 
  19. ·  Veale, Michael; Binns, Reuben; Ausloos, Jef (2018). “When data protection by design and data subject rights clash”. International Data Privacy Law. 8 (2): 105–123. doi:10.1093/idpl/ipy002. 
  20. ·  Zuiderveen Borgesius, Frederik J. (April 2016). “Singling out people without knowing their names – Behavioural targeting, pseudonymous data, and the new Data Protection Regulation”. Computer Law & Security Review. 32 (2): 256–271. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2015.12.013. ISSN 0267-3649. 
  21. ·  Proposal for the EU General Data Protection Regulation Archived 3 December 2012 at the Wayback Machine. European Commission. 25 January 2012. Retrieved 3 January 2013.
  22. ·  Baldry, Tony; Hyams, Oliver (15 May 2014). “The Right to Be Forgotten”. 1 Essex Court. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 1 June 2014. 
  23. ·  “European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 March 2014 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation)”. European Parliament. Archived from the original on 5 June 2014. Retrieved 1 June 2014. 
  24. ·  “Practical Data Privacy | Books by Thoughtworkers”. Thoughtworks. Retrieved 25 August 2023. 
  25. ·  “Right to object”. ico.org.uk. 30 August 2019. Archived from the original on 2 December 2019. Retrieved 14 November 2019. 
  26. ·  Sookman, Barry; Charles Morgan; Adam Goldenberg (30 April 2021). “Using privacy laws to regulate automated decision making”. Barry Sookman. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021. Retrieved 24 May 2021. 
  27. ·  Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 May 2023. UI v Österreichische Post AG. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof. Case C-300/21, ECLI:EU:C:2023:370: Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation for damage caused by data processing that infringes that regulation – Conditions governing the right to compensation – Mere infringement of that regulation not sufficient – Need for damage caused by that infringement – Compensation for non-material damage resulting from such processing – Incompatibility of a national rule making compensation for such damage subject to the exceeding of a threshold of seriousness – Rules for the determination of damages by national courts.
  28. ·  Österreichische Post (C-300/21), sub 54. 
  29. ·  Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 25 May 2023. ZQ v Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung Nordrhein, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts. Case C667/21, ECLI:EU:C:2023:433 (Provisional text)
  30. ·  “Privacy notices under the EU General Data Protection Regulation”. ico.org.uk. 19 January 2018. Archived from the original on 23 May 2018. Retrieved 22 May 2018. 
  31. ·  “What information must be given to individuals whose data is collected?”. Europa (web portal). Archived from the original on 23 May 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2018. 
  32. ·  “Privacy and Data Protection by Design – ENISA”. Europa (web portal). Archived from the original on 5 April 2017. Retrieved 4 April 2017. 
  33. ·  Data science under GDPR with pseudonymization in the data pipeline Archived 18 April 2018 at the Wayback Machine Published by Dativa, 17 April 2018
  34. ·  “Looking to comply with GDPR? Here’s a primer on anonymization and pseudonymization”. iapp.org. Archived from the original on 19 February 2018. Retrieved 19 February 2018. 
  35. ·  “EUR-Lex – Art. 37”. eur-lex.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 22 January 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017. 
  36. ·  “Explaining GDPR Data Subject Requests”. TrueVault. Archived from the original on 20 February 2019. Retrieved 19 February 2019. 
  37. ·  “Guidelines on Data Protection Officers (‘DPOs’)”. Archived from the original on 29 June 2017. Retrieved 2 November 2023. 
  38. ·  Jankowski, Piper-Meredith (21 June 2017). “reach of the GDPR: What is at stake?”. Lexology. Archived from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  39. ·  “L_2016119EN.01000101.xml”. eur-lex.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 10 November 2017. Retrieved 28 August 2016. 
  40. ·  “Exemptions”. ico.org.uk. 20 July 2020. Archived from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 11 November 2020. 
  41. ·  “The ‘Household Exemption’ In GDPR”. Fenech Farrugia Fiott Legal. 22 May 2020. Archived from the original on 29 October 2020. Retrieved 11 November 2020. 
  42. ·  Wehlander, Caroline (2016). “”Economic Activity”: Criteria and Relevance in the Fields of EU Internal Market Law, Competition Law and Procurement Law” (PDF). In Wehlander, Caroline (ed.). Services of General Economic Interest as a Constitutional Concept of EU Law. The Hague, Netherlands: TMC Asser Press. pp. 35–65. doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-117-3_2. ISBN 978-94-6265-116-6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2018. 
  43. ·  “The (Extra) Territorial Scope of the GDPR: The Right to Be Forgotten”. Fasken.com. 28 November 2019. Archived from the original on 21 February 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2020. 
  44. ·  “Extraterritorial Scope of GDPR: Do Businesses Outside the EU Need to Comply?”. American Bar Association. Archived from the original on 21 February 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2020.[dead link]
  45. ·  Art. 27(4) GDPR.
  46. ·  Art. 27(1) GDPR.
  47. ·  Art. 83(1), (2) & (4a) GDPR.
  48. ·  Art. 27(2) GDPR.
  49. ·  “UK: Understanding the full impact of Brexit on UK: EU data flows”. Privacy Matters. DLA Piper. 23 September 2019. Archived from the original on 20 February 2020. Retrieved 20 February 2020. 
  50. ·  Palmer, Danny. “On data protection, the UK says it will go it alone. It probably won’t”. ZDNet. Archived from the original on 16 February 2020. Retrieved 20 February 2020. 
  51. ·  Donnelly, Conor (18 January 2018). “How to transfer data to a ‘third country’ under the GDPR”. IT Governance Blog En. Archived from the original on 21 February 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2020. 
  52. ·  “Digital Rights post-Brexit”. Youtube. Open Rights Group. Archived from the original on 22 November 2022. Retrieved 27 November 2022. Video from Open Rights Group developed as an explainer of the UK’s proposals
  53. ·  “New Data Protection Act finalised in the UK”. Out-Law.com. Archived from the original on 25 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  54. ·  Ashford, Warwick (24 May 2018). “New UK Data Protection Act not welcomed by all”. Computer Weekly. Archived from the original on 24 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  55. ·  Porter, Jon (20 February 2020). “Google shifts authority over UK user data to the US in wake of Brexit”. The Verge. Archived from the original on 20 February 2020. Retrieved 20 February 2020. 
  56. ·  “Under-18s face ‘like’ and ‘streaks’ limits”. BBC News. 15 April 2019. Archived from the original on 15 April 2019. Retrieved 15 April 2019. 
  57. ·  Greenfield, Patrick (15 April 2019). “Facebook urged to disable ‘like’ feature for child users”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 15 April 2019. Retrieved 15 April 2019. 
  58. ·  Afifi-Sabet, Keumars (12 March 2021). “UK seeks divergence from GDPR to ‘fuel growth'”. IT PRO. Archived from the original on 13 March 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2021. 
  59. ·  “Data sharing myths busted”. Information Commissioner’s Office. Retrieved 19 October 2023. 
  60. ·  “Top nine GDPR myths busted”. WS Law. 22 January 2019. Retrieved 19 October 2023. 
  61. ·  “Five GDPR myth-busters”. Field Fisher. 11 May 2023. Retrieved 19 October 2023. 
  62. ·  Article 3 (2) of the GDPR
  63. ·  Gooch, Peter (2018). “A new era for privacy – GDPR six months on” (PDF). Deloitte UK. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 October 2020. Retrieved 26 November 2020. 
  64. ·  “How Smart Businesses Can Avoid GDPR Penalties When Recording Calls”. xewave.io. Archived from the original on 14 April 2018. Retrieved 13 April 2018. 
  65. ·  Babel, Chris (11 July 2017). “The High Costs of GDPR Compliance”. InformationWeek. UBM Technology Group. Archived from the original on 5 October 2017. Retrieved 4 October 2017. 
  66. ·  “Preparing for New Privacy Regimes: Privacy Professionals’ Views on the General Data Protection Regulation and Privacy Shield” (PDF). bakermckenzie.com. Baker & McKenzie. 4 May 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 August 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2017. 
  67. ·  Georgiev, Georgi. “GDPR Compliance Cost Calculator”. GIGAcalculator.com. Archived from the original on 16 May 2018. Retrieved 16 May 2018. 
  68. ·  Solon, Olivia (19 April 2018). “How Europe’s ‘breakthrough’ privacy law takes on Facebook and Google”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  69. ·  “Europe’s new privacy rules are no silver bullet”. Politico.eu. 22 April 2018. Archived from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  70. ·  “Lack of GDPR knowledge is a danger and an opportunity”. MicroscopeUK. Archived from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  71. ·  Jeong, Sarah (22 May 2018). “No one’s ready for GDPR”. The Verge. Archived from the original on 28 May 2018. Retrieved 1 June 2018. 
  72. ·  Edwards, Elaine (22 February 2018). “New rules on data protection pose compliance issues for firms”. The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  73. ·  Wes, Matt (25 April 2017). “Looking to comply with GDPR? Here’s a primer on anonymization and pseudonymization”. IAPP. Archived from the original on 19 February 2018. Retrieved 19 February 2018. 
  74. ·  Chassang, G. (2017). The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research. ecancermedicalscience, 11.
  75. ·  Tarhonen, Laura (2017). “Pseudonymisation of Personal Data According to the General Data Protection Regulation”. Archived from the original on 19 February 2018. Retrieved 19 February 2018. 
  76. ·  “A recent report issued by the Blockchain Association of Ireland has found there are many more questions than answers when it comes to GDPR”. siliconrepublic.com. 23 November 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2018. Retrieved 5 March 2018. 
  77. ·  Sample, Ian (27 January 2017). “AI watchdog needed to regulate automated decision-making, say experts”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 15 July 2017. 
  78. ·  “EU’s Right to Explanation: A Harmful Restriction on Artificial Intelligence”. techzone360.com. Archived from the original on 4 August 2017. Retrieved 15 July 2017. 
  79. ·  Wachter, Sandra; Mittelstadt, Brent; Floridi, Luciano (28 December 2016). “Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation”. International Data Privacy Law. SSRN 2903469. 
  80. ·  Edwards, Lilian; Veale, Michael (2017). “Slave to the algorithm? Why a “right to an explanation” is probably not the remedy you are looking for”. Duke Law and Technology Review. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2972855. SSRN 2972855. 
  81. ·  Frimin, Michael (29 March 2018). “Five benefits GDPR compliance will bring to your business”. Forbes. Archived from the original on 12 September 2018. Retrieved 11 September 2018. 
  82. ·  Butterworth, Trevor (23 May 2018). “Europe’s tough new digital privacy law should be a model for US policymakers”. Vox. Archived from the original on 12 September 2018. Retrieved 11 September 2018. 
  83. ·  Jaffe, Justin; Hautala, Laura (25 May 2018). “What the GDPR means for Facebook, the EU and you”. CNET. Archived from the original on 12 September 2018. Retrieved 11 September 2018. 
  84. ·  “Facebook CEO Zuckerberg’s Call for GDPR Privacy Laws Raises Questions”. www.cnbc.com. April 2019. Archived from the original on 4 April 2019. Retrieved 8 April 2019. 
  85. ·  Tiku, Nitasha (19 March 2018). “Europe’s new privacy law will change the web, and more”. Wired. Archived from the original on 15 October 2018. Retrieved 11 September 2018. 
  86. ·  Kalyanpur, Nikhil; Newman, Abraham (25 May 2018). “Today, a new E.U. law transforms privacy rights for everyone. Without Edward Snowden, it might never have happened”. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 11 October 2018. Retrieved 11 September 2018. 
  87. ·  Stallman, Richard (3 April 2018). “A radical proposal to keep your personal data safe”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 12 September 2018. Retrieved 11 September 2018. 
  88. ·  Afifi-Sabet, Keumars (3 May 2018). “Scammers are using GDPR email alerts to conduct phishing attacks”. IT PRO. Archived from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  89. ·  “EU gov’t and public health sites are lousy with adtech, study finds”. TechCrunch. 18 March 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2019. 
  90. ·  “EU citizens being tracked on sensitive government websites”. Financial Times. 18 March 2019. Archived from the original on 19 March 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2019. 
  91. ·  “Fall asleep in seconds by listening to a soothing voice read the EU’s new GDPR legislation”. The Verge. Archived from the original on 17 June 2018. Retrieved 16 June 2018. 
  92. ·   “How Europe’s GDPR Regulations Became a Meme”. Wired. Archived from the original on 18 June 2018. Retrieved 17 June 2018. 
  93. ·  “The Internet Created a GDPR-Inspired Meme Using Privacy Policies”. Adweek. Archived from the original on 17 June 2018. Retrieved 17 June 2018. 
  94. ·  Burgess, Matt. “Help, my lightbulbs are dead! How GDPR became bigger than Beyonce”. Wired.co.uk. Archived from the original on 19 June 2018. Retrieved 17 June 2018. 
  95. ·  “Here Are Some of the Worst Attempts At Complying with GDPR”. Motherboard. 25 May 2018. Archived from the original on 18 June 2018. Retrieved 17 June 2018. 
  96. ·  “What Percentage of Your Software Vulnerabilities Have GDPR Implications?” (PDF). HackerOne. 16 January 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 July 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2018. 
  97. ·  “The Data Protection Officer (DPO): Everything You Need to Know”. Cranium and HackerOne. 20 March 2018. Archived from the original on 31 August 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2018. 
  98. ·  “What might bug bounty programs look like under the GDPR?”. The International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP). 27 March 2018. Archived from the original on 6 July 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2018. 
  99. ·  Momen, N.; Hatamian, M.; Fritsch, L. (November 2019). “Did App Privacy Improve After the GDPR?”. IEEE Security Privacy. 17 (6): 10–20. doi:10.1109/MSEC.2019.2938445. ISSN 1558-4046. S2CID 203699369. 
  100. ·  Hatamian, Majid; Momen, Nurul; Fritsch, Lothar; Rannenberg, Kai (2019), Naldi, Maurizio; Italiano, Giuseppe F.; Rannenberg, Kai; Medina, Manel (eds.), “A Multilateral Privacy Impact Analysis Method for Android Apps”, Privacy Technologies and Policy, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer International Publishing, vol. 11498, pp. 87–106, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21752-5_7, ISBN 978-3-030-21751-8, S2CID 184483219, archived from the original on 12 July 2020, retrieved 3 June 2020
  101. ·  Moen, Gro Mette, Ailo Krogh Ravna, and Finn Myrstad. “Deceived by design – How tech companies use dark patterns to discourage us from exercising our rights to privacy” Archived 20 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine. 2018. Report by the Norwegian Consumer Council.
  102. ·  “Instapaper is temporarily shutting off access for European users due to GDPR”. The Verge. Archived from the original on 24 May 2018. Retrieved 24 May 2018. 
  103. ·  “Unroll.me to close to EU users saying it can’t comply with GDPR”. TechCrunch. 5 May 2018. Archived from the original on 30 May 2018. Retrieved 29 May 2018. 
  104. ·  Hern, Alex; Waterson, Jim (24 May 2018). “Sites block users, shut down activities and flood inboxes as GDPR rules loom”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 24 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  105. ·  “Blocking 500 Million Users Is Easier Than Complying With Europe’s New Rules”. Bloomberg L.P. 25 May 2018. Archived from the original on 25 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  106. ·  “U.S. News Outlets Block European Readers Over New Privacy Rules”. The New York Times. 25 May 2018. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  107. ·  “Look: Here’s what EU citizens see now that GDPR has landed”. Advertising Age. Archived from the original on 25 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  108. ·  Tiku, Nitasha (24 May 2018). “Why Your Inbox Is Crammed Full of Privacy Policies”. Wired. Archived from the original on 24 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  109. ·  Chen, Brian X. (23 May 2018). “Getting a Flood of G.D.P.R.-Related Privacy Policy Updates? Read Them”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 24 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  110. ·  Lanxon, Nate (25 May 2018). “Blocking 500 Million Users Is Easier Than Complying With Europe’s New Rules”. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 25 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018. 
  111. ·  “GDPR mayhem: Programmatic ad buying plummets in Europe”. Digiday. 25 May 2018. Archived from the original on 25 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  112. ·  Skiera, Bernd; Miller, Klaus Matthias; Jin, Yuxi; Kraft, Lennart; Laub, René; Schmitt, Julia (5 July 2022). The impact of the GDPR on the online advertising market. Frankfurt am Main: Bernd Skiera. ISBN 978-3-9824173-0-1. OCLC 1322186902. 
  113. ·  “Press corner”. European Commission – European Commission. Archived from the original on 27 December 2020. Retrieved 18 September 2020. 
  114. ·  “Your rights matter: Data protection and privacy – Fundamental Rights Survey”. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. 12 June 2020. Archived from the original on 25 September 2020. Retrieved 18 September 2020. 
  115. ·  “GDPR: noyb.eu filed four complaints over ‘forced consent’ against Google, Instagram, WhatsApp and Facebook” (PDF). NOYB.eu. 25 May 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  116. ·  “Facebook and Google hit with $8.8 billion in lawsuits on day one of GDPR”. The Verge. Archived from the original on 25 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  117. ·  “Max Schrems files first cases under GDPR against Facebook and Google”. The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 25 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  118. ·  “Facebook, Google face first GDPR complaints over ‘forced consent'”. TechCrunch. 25 May 2018. Archived from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  119. ·  Meyer, David. “Google, Facebook hit with serious GDPR complaints: Others will be soon”. ZDNet. Archived from the original on 28 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  120. ·  Fox, Chris (21 January 2019). “Google hit with £44m GDPR fine”. BBC News. Archived from the original on 21 January 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2019. 
  121. ·  Porter, Jon (21 January 2019). “Google fined €50 million for GDPR violation in France”. The Verge. Archived from the original on 10 June 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2019. 
  122. ·  Masnick, Mike (19 November 2018). “Yet Another GDPR Disaster: Journalists Ordered To Hand Over Secret Sources Under ‘Data Protection’ Law”. Archived from the original on 20 November 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2018. 
  123. ·  Bălăiți, George (9 November 2018). “English Translation of the Letter from the Romanian Data Protection Authority to RISE Project”. Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Archived from the original on 9 November 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2018. 
  124. ·  “Intention to fine British Airways £183.39m under GDPR for data breach”. ICO. 8 July 2019. Archived from the original on 6 December 2020. Retrieved 22 December 2020. 
  125. ·  Whittaker, Zack (11 September 2018). “British Airways breach caused by credit card skimming malware, researchers say”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 10 December 2018. Retrieved 9 December 2018. 
  126. ·  “British Airways boss apologises for ‘malicious’ data breach”. BBC News. 7 September 2018. Archived from the original on 15 October 2018. Retrieved 7 September 2018. 
  127. ·  Sweney, Mark (8 July 2019). “BA faces £183m fine over passenger data breach”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 8 July 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2019. 
  128. ·  “British Airways faces record £183m fine for data breach”. BBC News. 8 July 2019. Archived from the original on 8 July 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2019. 
  129. ·   “ICO fines British Airways £20m for data breach affecting more than 400,000 customers”. ICO. 16 October 2020. Archived from the original on 16 October 2020. Retrieved 22 December 2020. 
  130. ·  Vinocur, Nicholas (27 December 2019). “‘We have a huge problem’: European regulator despairs over lack of enforcement”. Politico. Archived from the original on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 6 May 2020. 
  131. ·  Ryan, Johnny (31 January 2023). “Europe-wide overhaul of GDPR monitoring triggered by ICCL”. Irish Council for Civil Liberties. Archived from the original on 6 April 2023. Retrieved 8 April 2023. 
  132. ·  Alizadeh, Fatemeh; Jakobi, Timo; Boldt, Jens; Stevens, Gunnar (2019). “GDPR-Reality Check on the Right to Access Data”. Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019. New York: ACM Press. pp. 811–814. doi:10.1145/3340764.3344913. ISBN 978-1-4503-7198-8. S2CID 202159324. 
  133. ·   Alizadeh, Fatemeh; Jakobi, Timo; Boden, Alexander; Stevens, Gunnar; Boldt, Jens (2020). “GDPR Reality Check–Claiming and Investigating Personally Identifiable Data from Companies” (PDF). EuroUSEC. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 June 2020. Retrieved 17 June 2020. 
  134. ·  Human, Soheil; Cech, Florian (2021). “A Human-Centric Perspective on Digital Consenting: The Case of GAFAM” (PDF). In Zimmermann, Alfred; Howlett, Robert J.; Jain, Lakhmi C. (eds.). Human Centred Intelligent Systems. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Vol. 189. Singapore: Springer. pp. 139–159. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5784-2_12. ISBN 978-981-15-5784-2. S2CID 214699040. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 23 August 2020. 
  135. ·  Christakis and Propp, Theodore and Kenneth (8 March 2021). “How Europe’s Intelligence Services Aim to Avoid the EU’s Highest Court—and What It Means for the United States”. Lawfare. Archived from the original on 13 March 2021. Retrieved 13 March 2021. 
  136. ·  Browne, Ryan (18 January 2022). “Fines for breaches of EU privacy law spike sevenfold to $1.2 billion, as Big Tech bears the brunt”. CNBC. Archived from the original on 9 February 2022. Retrieved 9 February 2022. 
  137. ·  Roberts, Jeff John (25 May 2018). “The GDPR Is in Effect: Should U.S. Companies Be Afraid?”. Archived from the original on 28 May 2018. Retrieved 28 May 2018. 
  138. ·   “Commentary: California’s New Data Privacy Law Could Begin a Regulatory Disaster”. Fortune. Archived from the original on 10 April 2019. Retrieved 10 April 2019. 
  139. ·  “California Unanimously Passes Historic Privacy Bill”. Wired. Archived from the original on 29 June 2018. Retrieved 29 June 2018. 
  140. ·  “Marketers and tech companies confront California’s version of GDPR”. Archived from the original on 29 June 2018. Retrieved 29 June 2018. 
  141. ·  “Virginia passes the Consumer Data Protection Act”. International Association of Privacy Professionals. 3 March 2021. Archived from the original on 30 August 2021. Retrieved 26 August 2021. 
  142. ·  “Colorado Privacy Act becomes law”. International Association of Privacy Professionals. 8 July 2021. Archived from the original on 26 August 2021. Retrieved 26 August 2021. 
  143. ·  “KİŞİSEL VERİLERİ KORUMA KURUMU | KVKK | History”. www.kvkk.gov.tr. Retrieved 19 December 2020. 
  144. ·  “China’s New National Privacy Law: The PIPL – Privacy – China”. www.mondaq.com. Archived from the original on 9 February 2022. Retrieved 9 February 2022. 
  145. ·  Portal, S. M. E. “New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP)”. www.kmu.admin.ch. Archived from the original on 25 March 2023. Retrieved 25 March 2023. 
  146. ·  “Data protection reform: Council adopts position at first reading – Consilium”. Europa (web portal). Archived from the original on 6 October 2017. Retrieved 14 April 2016. 
  147. ·  Adoption of the Council’s position at first reading Archived 25 November 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Votewatch.eu
  148. ·  Written procedure Archived 1 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine, 8 April 2016, Council of the European Union
  149. ·  “Data protection reform – Parliament approves new rules fit for the digital era – News – European Parliament”. 14 April 2016. Archived from the original on 17 April 2016. Retrieved 14 April 2016. 
  150. ·  “General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) entered into force in the EEA”. EFTA. 20 July 2018. Archived from the original on 1 October 2018. Retrieved 30 September 2018. 
  151. ·  Kolsrud, Kjetil (10 July 2018). “GDPR – 20. juli er datoen!”. Rett24. Archived from the original on 13 July 2018. Retrieved 13 July 2018. 
  152. ·  “Digital Single Market”. Digital Single Market. Archived from the original on 8 October 2017. Retrieved 5 October 2017. 
  153. ·  “What does the ePrivacy Regulation mean for the online industry? – ePrivacy”. www.eprivacy.eu. Archived from the original on 22 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018. 
  154. ·  “Council position and findings on the application of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), 19 December 2019”. Consilium. Archived from the original on 23 December 2019. Retrieved 23 December 2019.

3.2 中文词条引用列表

  1. ·  EUR-Lex – 32016R0679 – EN – EUR-Lex. Eur-lex.europa.eu. [2018-05-28]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-30） （英语）. 
  2. ·   2016/679 ). Eur-lex.europa.eu. [2018-05-28]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-30） （英语）. 
  3. ·   Presidency of the Council: “Compromise text. Several partial general approaches have been instrumental in converging views in Council on the proposal for a General Data Protection Regulation in its entirety. The text on the Regulation which the Presidency submits for approval as a General Approach appears in annex,” 201 pages, 11 June 2015, PDF, http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-9565-2015-INIT/en/pdf （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）
  4. ·  EUR-Lex – 31995L0046 – EN – EUR-Lex. [2018-05-01]. （原始内容存档于2017-12-29）. 
  5. ·  Blackmer, W.S. GDPR: Getting Ready for the New EU General Data Protection Regulation. Information Law Group. InfoLawGroup LLP. 5 May 2016 [22 June 2016]. （原始内容存档于2018-05-14）. 
  6. ·  New Data Protection Act finalised in the UK. Out-Law.com. [25 May 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-05-25）. 
  7. ·  New UK Data Protection Act not welcomed by all. Computer Weekly. [25 May 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-05-24） （英国英语）. 
  8. ·  Art. 3 GDPR – Territorial scope | General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). [2018-04-12]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-04） （美国英语）. 
  9. ·  Fines and Penalties – GDPR EU.org. [2018-04-12]. （原始内容存档于2018-04-12） （美国英语）. 
  10. ·  How did we get there? – GDPR EU.org. [2019-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2020-03-25） （美国英语）. 
  11. ·  The regulation – GDPR EU.org. [2019-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2021-01-20） （美国英语）. 
  12. ·  Data protection (PDF). European Commission – European Commission. [3 January 2013]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于3 December 2012）. 
  13. ·  Data protection reform: Council adopts position at first reading – Consilium. Europa (web portal). [2021-03-30]. （原始内容存档于2017-10-06）. 
  14. ·  Adoption of the Council’s position at first reading 互联网档案馆的存档，存档日期25 November 2017., Votewatch.eu
  15. ·  Written procedure 互联网档案馆的存档，存档日期1 December 2017., 8 April 2016, Council of the European Union
  16. ·  Data protection reform – Parliament approves new rules fit for the digital era – News – European Parliament. [14 April 2016]. （原始内容存档于17 April 2016）. 
  17. ·  Official Journal L 119/2016. eur-lex.europa.eu. [26 May 2018]. （原始内容存档于22 November 2018）. 
  18. ·  General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) entered into force in the EEA. EFTA. 20 July 2018 [30 September 2018]. （原始内容存档于1 October 2018）. 
  19. ·  Kolsrud, Kjetil. GDPR – 20. juli er datoen!. Rett24. 10 July 2018 [13 July 2018]. （原始内容存档于13 July 2018）.

4. 外部链接

分享到：